Talk:Traditional economy

Content issues

99.172.182.165 deleted the page, which had sourced information, and replaced it with a strongly POV, less informative, unsourced article with poor grammar. I reverted the page and requested semi-protection. Dan Cottrell (talk) 20:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional economy

Such economies are found where the ;agents of production, distibution and consumption are the same.

Kinship tends to be important, but it is not the only way for traditional economic groups to organize themselves.

71.214.104.114 (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)lelandgilsen@msn.com[reply]

The article should state which theoretical approach it uses to describe "traditional" economies and at least point out that there are different possible interpretation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.16.84.105 (talk) 17:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed some of the bias to make it unbias you guys should try that XO anyways dont argue do. Bye -Wind—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.16.84.105 (talk) 17:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the fake ip:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arphibagon (talk • contribs) 11:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a term that even exists?

All of the sources don't seem to think "Traditional economy" is a separate concept, they're merely sources that happen to use this in the simple and obvious English meaning. That doesn't mean it deserves a separate article, in the same way that "traditional bandana" or "old-fashioned economy" don't have separate articles. Are there any sources that set aside this as some separate topic from historical economics? SnowFire (talk) 05:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]