Talk:Trades Union Certification Officer

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Factual changes made by The Certification Office. Please do not change or revert back.

Call us on 03301093602 if you want to make any changes.

Certification Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/certification-officer

Update request

Please can someone explain why the update has been reverted again on 28 February?

kind Regards

Shanta Hello there

I updated this page twice recently and both times it got reverted back to the old version. The original text is incorrect particularly with regards to listing applications and the Certification Office want to correct this and update the page generally to be more helpful.

Kind Regards Shanta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.126.68 (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThurstonMitchell: just as an FYI since I think they're talking to you. Reversions could probably use a bit more detail in the edit summaries. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been following the lead of another editor who has reverted the anonymous editor’s revisions. Look at the history and speak with them about why they reverte. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was @Gjs238:, who can hopefully expand, however, @ThurstonMitchell:, if you're going to revert edits then you should be able to elucidate why you did so on its own merits, in case the original editor's decision was flawed (or even if not, so you can explain why) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speak to that editor.

my last revert was because you delete the references and categories, IIRC without looking at the article so it appears to be vandalism or disruptive editing. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]