Talk:Traction TeamPage

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-25. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

There is a notice suggesting that the Traction TeamPage page is a candidate for speedy deletion on this page which I created last night. My justification for creating this page is that all the early to market blog software companies and products have pages.

These include Radio Userland, SixApart MovableType and TypePad, SocialText and JotSpot. If commercial products (or open source products for that matter) do not have a place in wikipedia, then it logically follows that at least all the commercial products I list here should also be deleted.

If the text of my entry sounds too much like advertising, then I suggest someone edit it to make it more in line with your expectations. That said, I was very careful to act within the norms set by other commercial weblog software product pages.

If historical significance is the litmus test, this Traction TeamPage page also stands as a relevant entry, as relevant as the Userland and MovableType pages and more so than the SocialText and JotSpot pages (and way more relevant than the smattering of open source blog and wiki software pages that represent branches of existing wiki/blog software or are simple knockoffs with similar functionality):

- Traction Software was founded in 1996 long before any of these other companies. - The product was built as a true hypertext journal (modeled after Doug Engelbart's 1968 NLS) and is the only product in the market to have a journaled audit trail with as much depth. - Traction the product was released earlier (1999) than all of them, with commercial launch under the name Traction TeamPage in July 2002. - In terms of product relevance, Traction TeamPage was the first blog software product to provide a single system with multiple integrated blog/wiki workspaces, provide bi-directional link referencing (long before Trackback was conceived of), cross-blog tagging (with labels), cross-blog commenting, paragraph level discussion threading, full edit history on pages as well as comments, WebDAV enabled document management, and LDAP & Active Directory (with NTLM) integration. - Traction Software (the company) was first to be venture funded, in 2000 by In-Q-Tel which is the venture arm of the Central Intelligence Agency. - Traction TeamPage was the first product to be called an Enterprise Weblog (by an Jon Udell, an InfoWorld analyst, in 2002 --> http://www.infoworld.com/article/02/07/12/020715aptraction_1.html).

Traction TeamPage references

See references to TeamPage's May 2003 Release 1.0 Social Software review (by Clay Shirky), and May 2006 review in depth as one of nine blogging platforms covered in Forrester Research's Blogging Wave report. I believe these and the other references added clearly meet the criteria "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself." established in WP:CORP as the critera for a notable product or company. Traction Software is an influential early mover in developing and selling social software for business uses including: competitive intelligence, product / project management and others.

Additional references, removed PROD tag and template

After adding and reviewing additional references from well respected independent business analysts and customers, I removed the PROD template and Tags following the Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion procedure as I understand it. I read the references and welcome corrections if I've misunderstood the process. I believe that the article has been substantially improved by providing independent references that meet WP:CORP criteria.

Fair use rationale for Image:Tractionsoftware.png

Image:Tractionsoftware.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

I'd like to see some alternate viewpoints on this page. It's pretty one sided. If the company is notable enough to get an article, it should be notable enough to have some criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.80.134 (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: copyright company press releases. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]