I created a stub page. We should see it there is any analysis of the methodology of how the figures were arrived at. A realistic list would factor in pollution in relation to revenue. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article will also need to explain why this list is notable and provide third party references. Otherwise we are just republishing their list, which could be considered promotion or copyright infringement. --Itub (talk) 05:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I felt it deserved an article since it is mentioned numerous times in WP articles. There is also plenty of third party info on it. I will expand it at some stage. I doubt that publishing a list of this nature and in this style would constitute copyright infringement. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]