Talk:Toussaint Louverture/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk · contribs) 15:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm happy to review this article.
Initial thoughts: there are three apparently valid {{citation needed}} tags, and several other uncited claims including a quote from Henri Christophe. These all need fixing if the article is to read Good Article status. There are also many citations to James 1814: is such a dated source reliable? And several to James without any date given: are these to James 1814 or James 1934? And in either case is that a reliable source? Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- As the nominator has not been active for over a month and there has been no engagement with this review in a week, I am going to fail it now. Anyone who wants to bring the article up to GA would be well advised to fix the sourcing issues before renominating. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)