Talk:Tourism in Poland
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
December 2014
[edit]- The Lesser Poland is the most beautiful part of the country. It's also much more popular than Lower Silesia. I recommend to delete the part about Wroclaw and put Gdansk instead. It's more popular.213.158.222.218 (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- WP:NOR: TripAdvisor. ""Top 10 Destinations – Poland"". Travelers' Choice 2013 (Winners). TripAdvisor.ca The world largest travel site. pp. 1 of 10. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
Travelers' Choice 2014 Update: 1. Krakow, 2. Warsaw, 3. Wroclaw, 4. Poznan, 5. Bialystok, 6. Sopot, 7. Zakopane, 8. Lodz, 9. Szczecin, 10. Gdynia.
{{cite web}}: External link in|quote=|publisher=(help) Poeticbent talk 20:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- WP:NOR: TripAdvisor. ""Top 10 Destinations – Poland"". Travelers' Choice 2013 (Winners). TripAdvisor.ca The world largest travel site. pp. 1 of 10. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
Pictures
[edit]Gdańsk should be presented by something different than a beach. Poznań fair is controversial. I have replaced Szczein houses (there are plenty of them in many cities) with the new Philharmonic Hall, very special.Xx236 (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC) What is your opinion about Bydgoszcz' beauty? There are several touristic towns (Zamość, Sandomierz), which pictures deserves presentation here.Xx236 (talk) 07:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC) I don't like the marina picture, the lakes or Augustów Canal would be more interesting.Xx236 (talk) 07:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
22 May 2016
[edit]Re: User:Twofortnights (+1,849) . . (looks good here, but if you think there is something to be fixed please go ahead and fix it rather than remove information entirely. thank you)
- Please do not underestimate my assumption of good faith on your part. I spent half an hour trying to fix it before I gave up, unable to quote-unquote fix it. You forced the entire bodytext of this article below a large infobox column containing 10 images meaning, you practically blanked the page all the way through before your new bar boxes show up. And, you made a formatting mistake in your second bar box (yet to be identified, beginning with preposterous 1360px in width?), which exploded the graph size to three-times the computer screen with a zipper underneath. Please explain; what you mean, when you say "looks good here"? Are you editing from a smart phone, or some other mobile device? – Because you don't seem to be seeing what I'm seeing on a standard computer monitor which sits on my table in front of me. Poeticbent talk 00:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see you don't have much willingness to either discuss the issue in fair and friendly manner (first you start with some kind of semi-threat then you go on to use adjectives like "preposterous"). I believe you could have better used this time you used to write the comment above to fix any problems that may appear on your screen, maybe by using a different table altogether. But of course the easiest thing was to simply erase all information despite the fact that the problem seems to be of technical nature only.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, you don't seem to be listening. I said, I spend half an hour trying to fix it, but did not succeed therefore I had no choice but to remove it from mainspace. It is you who makes me waste my time, because the errors are there (below), yet you claim that they weren't, and nothing gets done in the end. Poeticbent talk 19:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
19th place 2016
[edit]http://factsmaps.com/top-30-most-visited-countries-by-international-tourist-arrivals/ Xx236 (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)