Talk:Tourism in Malta/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- A good GA-level article - congratulations and thank you for the hard work put into it. In the run-up to FA, I would suggest providing additional information on Maltese attractions in particular, and diversifying the references beyond the Maltese government websites. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)