Talk:Touch of Modern

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Touch of Modern article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 16 June 2013 by reviewer Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs).

Notability?

Does every company, no matter how large or small, new or old, get an article in Wikipedia? This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a "Who's Who" of American business. This company Touch of Modern is not unique in any way. The entry cites two articles written by the company's founder. This article is a promo piece and should be removed. Chisme (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a policy on including entities that openly discriminate based on gender?

I’ll open and close with a simpler version of what I mean, in duplicate: Is it ok to include entities that (publicly) practice discrimination? The entity called “Touch of Modern” MAY legally discriminate by gender. Idk whether they DO, but the info on their home site seems to me like they do exclude women from membership. IF they are actually restricting membership to men only, idk whether they are doing so legally. Those are my background thoughts, but my issue for Wikipedia is whether Wikipedia’s policy allows (or maybe requires allowance, on the other end of the spectrum, in its own attempt to NOT discriminate lol) entries for entities that are exclusive in memberships. I hope someone is able to decipher my bunch of words. That’s why I’ll open and close with a simpler version of what I mean, in duplicate: Is it ok to include entities that (publicly) practice discrimination? Dbreyna (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]