Talk:Totekiko
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 December 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus at this time is that the current title is the WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Totekiko → Tōtekiko – correct spelling. Gryffindor (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Names or other words transliterated into English from languages that do not use the Latin alphabet should only employ accents and diacritics if that is how the WP:COMMONNAME is rendered in each respective instance. As indicated in Photographs under "External links", there is no diacritic. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 10:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- See name display case, your argument is running counter to what is established [1]. Gryffindor (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- The display case notwithstanding, here are google results which confirm that the WP:COMMONNAME in English for "Totekiko stone garden in Kyoto" is without the diacritic. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- See name display case, your argument is running counter to what is established [1]. Gryffindor (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support per correct spelling and enabling correct pronunciation. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose no evidence that the proposed spelling is the one most commonly used by English language sources.--65.92.162.81 (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning oppose, as the only actual evidence of use that has been provided is in support of the current title. BD2412 T 16:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.