Talk:Total ring of fractions

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Total quotient ring of R[x]

It is strange to speak of rational functions over a ring that is not a field. The reference currently cited defines the field of rational functions only over a ground field K. The sentence could be changed to assume that R is a field, but then this becomes just an instance of the field of fractions of an integral domain, so it fits better at field of fractions, not here. (In fact, this example already appears there.) Ebony Jackson (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 April 2015

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Total quotient ring → Total ring of fractions – Mainly because I like the new name better :) More seriously, the new name seems more standard and accurate. The field of fractions used to be called the quotient field, but because of confusion with quotient ring, the terminology is no longer in use. It makes sense to adopt the modern terminology here as well.--Relisted. George Ho (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Taku (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not an expert, but Total ring of fractions does seem like the modern term for it. As long as there is a redirect from Total quotient ring and the alternative names remain in the article, I would have no problem with this move. --Mark viking (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.