Jump to content

Talk:Tory Burch/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    30-acre should be converted into decare. The lead is a little thin, and all sections should be mentioned, yet there is little on her personal life there, especially her adult part. The business part is fine in the lead.
    I don't know much about decares and don't see them at Template:Convert/list_of_units. I switched to hectares.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold—a little longer lead, and the decare thing, and it is a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I am not sure how much more you want in the WP:LEAD. If you still want more, let me know.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Passing GA. You are right about the hectare—careful reading shows that the decare is only used in Norway and the Ottoman empire (guess where I am from). The lead looks great. Arsenikk (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]