Talk:Torry
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussion-page etiquette
[edit]Please take care not to accidentally delete parts of the comments of other users.
Images
[edit]Can someone add some picture of Torry and surrounding area (Nigg Bay, St Fittick's Church, Torry Battery et al) as well as the details of the 2005 Doors Open Day buildings that were open. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.105.165.178 (talk • contribs) on 17 June 2006.
- This is a good idea, but I've removed the request for it from the main article — it's off-putting to readers and just not the Wikipedia standard to request images there, when this page exists for that. This isn't just being pedantic. Part of the reasoning is that sometimes Wikipedia articles are viewed through other sites, or on CD, and such "self-reference" to Wikipedia editing "breaks the illusion", as it were. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- As well as some pictures a map of Torry, and said location with Aberdeen City / Grampian may increase the effectiveness the entry up well.--Ragudave 10:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- http://www.doorsopendays.org.uk/ab.htm This page reminded me that Tullos School was one of the DOD attractions in Torry. The school was designed like a fighter bomber and still retains some original features.
- Wow. Why? Was a previous school destroyed by bombing? – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 10:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think the designer / architect was a specialist Spitfire designer or something like that. A few other Aberdeen primary schools also have the same design. I was at Tullos School last DOD and have forgotten most of what they told me. I think twas a new build rather than a replacement?--Ragudave 09:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Can I ask if anyone know what Bridge House, that stands at the end of Wellington Bridge was originally used for, it looks institutional to me. would be obliged for any information.89.168.114.91 (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Ferry disaster
[edit]A seperate para on the Torry Ferry disaster would be quite interesting, as the first I heard about it was in a track by local song writer The Kitchen Cynics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.105.165.178 (talk • contribs) on 17 June 2006.
- Somebody anonymous had removed the 32 lives fact. Perhaps (showing good faith here) they intended to write the paragraph you suggest. But they haven't yet, so I've put the fact back in, and taken the opportunity to add a little more from the Council's recent "New History". – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- How about a seperate Torry Ferry Disaster entry, with a brief mention on the Torry entry?--Ragudave 10:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- It would be great to have more on this (although personally I'd go for a section of this page, rather than a whole new article.) But in adding the fact that the passengers were returning from a pleasure trip to the Bay of Nigg, I've added all the info contained in the Council's "New History" millennium tome. Do you have any reports on the disaster that provide more detail? – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 10:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Cheerful Vale
[edit]The Cheerful Vale enhibition had a great brochure which detailed the History of Torry and its buildings? A link to this would be great--Ragudave 10:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Is it online? I've got a printed copy, and used it as a reference for some of the info (for example the Balnagask Motte) but I wasn't aware of an online version. I removed the link to a website advertising the exhibition, because now that the exhibition is over, that web page is due to be removed. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 10:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've e mailed the Archeo dept at Aberdeen Council for further info about the Torry Ferry disaster and the Chherful Vale brochure. I'll edit and add depending on what reply I get.--Ragudave 09:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Reply from the archeology dept of Aberdeen Council -
I've emailed your message on to my colleague Chris Croly, who will I'm sure correct any points he notices. Torry Battery is a scheduled ancient monument, protected by law as a site of national importance (ie not by the local authority). I've tried to change that - not sure whether it worked!
Cheerful Vale is not on line yet, but we hope to arrange that reasonably soon. There's also the Torry Battery leaflet, now more or less out of print, but perhaps available on line before long.--Ragudave 09:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Great work, Ragudave, it's really encouraging that the archaeology dept. are taking an interest, since they should be a valuable source of info, and it's nice that they consider the article worth their time. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 15:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I tried three of the external links and none of them took me to anything relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.210.115 (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Torry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927193504/http://beehive.thisisnorthscotland.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=2311&PageID=24001 to http://beehive.thisisnorthscotland.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=2311&PageID=24001
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)