Talk:Tornado Low Level/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting. Happy to offer a review. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The non-free images have incomplete rationales. Do we need both? I wonder if just the gameplay image would be sufficient?
- It would be weird to have a game article not have anything like a title screen or boxart. Also I filled the rationales. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"GamesTM declared that, despite stating flaws in the game, said it stood the test of time." This sentence is a bit all over the place!
- I removed the source. It did not add much overall. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why not incorporate the Your Spectrum external link as a reference?
- Added it as reference. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What's the value of the other two external links? If they're reliable sources, perhaps incorporate them, and, if not, perhaps remove them?
- Fits in line with the Manual of Style. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok - could you explain what they are adding? If they're reliable sources, perhaps you could add them as full references in a further reading section? I think I would prefer that to external links. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't believe they are considered reliable sources. I can replace them with a Mobygames link instead. GamerPro64 12:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Multidirectional shooters? Category:Combat flight simulators (or Category:Flight simulation video games)? Is it worth creating a Vortex Software category?
- I think the first one. Also might be worth making a Vortex category. Might do that later. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you could mention more explicitly that this was developed in the UK?
- Done. GamerPro64 00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, this looks great from a first read through. The prose is maybe a little choppy, but of GA-standard, as far as I'm concerned. Please double-check my edits. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now happy with the external links, and I think the image switch was a good move. Happy to promote. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]