Talk:Toreador (World of Darkness)

Rating scale

As to the quality scale, I would say this article is actually a stub (unlike all the mislabeled ones by User:Craw-daddy). Please add more information and cite your sources!

As to importance, I looked at things like a hierarchy as the article said to do- Vampire: The Masqurade (top), Clans in V:TM (high), Bloodlines in V:TM (Mid). As Toreador is a Clan and in V:TM Clans are crucial to the game, it's high.

--Lamoxlamae (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

Is there a way this can be expanded upon further? All the other clans seem to have a lot more information than Toreadors. I think they deserve as much information as possible. I will see what I can add further later. RasstheLenek 23:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Role-playing games#Category:Vampire: The Masquerade where a discussion is occurring about merging pages in this category. --Craw-daddy | T | 12:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Explanation and Disagreement about Merging and / or Deletion

The "Clans" in Vampire are equivalent to the character classes in Dungeons and Dragons, they are NOT just a story element. As wiki deems fit to allow the character classes of Dungeons and Dragons to have their own articles (Bard (Dungeons & Dragons), etc), there is no reason why the "character classes" of another exceedingly popular pen-and-paper RPG are not notable enough to have their own articles. Even more so since they ARE both Character Classes AND major elements of the story.

In addition, considering the large amounts of background info and game-based info on each of the clans, it is NOT feasible to merge them all into one article. In fact, if we were to do so the resulting article would be too big and then go against Wiki standards.

Please stop listing all Vampire:The Masquerade articles as non-notable.Flygongengar (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]