Talk:Topgolf

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

It is requested that an image or photograph of Topgolf be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Dallas may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to TopGolf Mike Cline (talk) 12:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Topgolf → TopGolf – Brand is referenced throughout company website as 'TopGolf' rather than 'Topgolf'. 80.93.200.170 (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks and WP:OFFICIALNAMES. Wikipedia does not necessarily use official names, and does not have to follow nonstandard text formatting in trademarks, even if the trademark owner considers it "official". --RJFF (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually camelcase is acceptable on Wikipedia. The mostm actually states on this issue Trademarks in Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable. It also mentions mentions as an example that either OxyContin or Oxycontin can be used per editor choice. In short the MOSTM does not disallow TopGolf as a title. The real question is do most sources use Topgolf or TopGolf?--174.93.171.10 (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Just Google topgolf -wikipedia and you'll see almost exclusive use of the camel case form. I also think this is a case where readability is enhanced. --BDD (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Support In line with other brands (SharePoint, OneNote, ServiceNow, etc.). --Zolacolor (talk) 11:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential neutral references

This links displays ~ 77 references for TopGolf: [1] --Mike Cline (talk) 12:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]