Talk:Tool Academy (American TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tool Academy (American TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Performances in Porn

The information in this article regarding the pornographic/gay porn performances by numerous men from this program is factual. A link to the web page. It was previously deleted because the only citation was to the pornographic website on which the men appeared. This is a little bit silly considering that linking through to that page immediately leads to nude images and pornographic video clips of the men in question. Be that as it may, the current edit contains a plethora of third party references on this topic. The question is whether or not they are reliable. I understand there are certain protections in place, but having read over the guidelines I'm not sure what can be done. Surely there are exceptions in situations where information is blatantly able to be confirmed as fact? When the "letter of the law" gets in the way of its intent, I feel like there's a problem.

Having said that, the next person who decides to completely wipe out this very relevant, very factual section: I would ask that you take a few minutes to try and find more reliable references before completely removing the content. Any fool can see it's fact by clicking to the porn site in question. So the issue is not in PROVING it's fact. The issue is in meeting the reference guidelines on Wikipedia. It seems to me that there has to be a way to have absolute, clear fact meet these guidelines in a happy medium. CouplandForever (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

> Didnt wanna create a new section, but it should probably say Tool Academy was a... seeing as how the show is not continuing or no plans as of.Captain Marshalls (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. Reubot (talk) 02:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I still think it should be changed, seeing as how there's no plans of another season, but I won't. Captain Marshalls (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]