This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
List George Daniel and Matthew Healy by their full names under producers per Template:Infobox song Done
The writing and production sentence should be the second one of the lead instead Done
"The song was released on" → "It was released on" Done
Remove the names of the previous singles because that is irrelevant to the article Done, also the release date is not mentioned anywhere in the body; maybe add it at the start of reception and retitle to Release and reception? Done
Writing and production credits are not written directly in the lead but are sourced from personnel; try to write out somewhere like the opening section Done
"It was written by" → "The song was written by" Done
Maybe identify Guendoline Rome Viray Gomez by his stage name of No Rome to avoid confusion, as you use that later on? Done
@Kyle Peake:He is credited by his legal name. I'm not overly familiar with the WP policy for legal (vs stage) names, but I can change it if you feel it's appropriate.Giacobbetalk13:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe:I could understand this if it was the only mention of him in the lead, but he is later mentioned by his stage name of No Rome so to avoid confusion for readers, you should either list him as that initially since songwriting credits list musicians under their real names, or use the real name initially but put "who has the stage name of No Rome" afterwards. --K. Peake15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe: Okay, no worries! I honestly didn't know haha (most of the articles I write are from the 1975, and they write/produce all their songs without stage names), but that makes sense! Giacobbetalk16:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"was handled by former two." → "was handled by the former two." Done
"The song's beat originated from" → "The beat originated from" Done
"during "Narcissist" (2018), the band's" → "during the recording of "Narcissist", the band's" to be specific; also, release years for songs are not notable for the lead Done
Remove wikilink on No Rome Done
It is not sourced in the body that they continued working on the beat with No Rome Done
Remove "achieved moderate success on worldwide music charts" since such language is not suitable for the lead; merge the previous parts of that sentence with the one about the UK/Scotland Done
Ireland position should come before the US one because the former is a main chart Done
Add the word chart after Billboard Hot Rock & Alternative Songs Done
@Kyle Peake: I think I've fixed the issues. I'm admittedly not very good with understanding the different ways to properly reference quotes on WP. If you could just give this a once over, that'd be much appreciated! Giacobbetalk16:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Ringer should not be italicised Done
Mention the groove in comp too since that's notable Done
"on the album's core theme; relationships" → "on the album's core theme of relationships" Done
"calling it: "their" → "calling it "their" Done
"trends into the groups" → "trends into the 1975's" Done
He is not listed for producer or anything else that would be confusing not to put his stage name for, so keep as real name... this was more of a query. --K. Peake15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I did not put reliable sources as y or n since I am not sure either way about ref 35. --K. Peake11:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake: I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. Thank you for another amazing review (and the first one for ABIIOR!). Please let me know if there's anything I've missed :) Giacobbetalk16:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe: Looks good, apart from the one QWQ issue with "at the same time."" in the reception section; it is not a full sentence so the full-stop should be after speech marks. --K. Peake17:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe:✓Pass now, they were two more issues that had arisen but they were not ones that had been gone over here so I fixed them myself. Congrats on scoring a GA during the backlog drive!!! --K. Peake18:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I did not put reliable sources as y or n since I am not sure either way about ref 35. --K. Peake 11:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)