Talk:Tony DiNozzo and Ziva David
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]There seems to have been a misunderstanding; this is not a duplicative article, and it is not created to individually cover the subjects of the fictional characters Tony DiNozzo and Ziva David, which already have their own articles. This new article is a split that I first discussed creating on June 7. I explained the reasoning here and here, and no one objected. Please remove the speedy deletion tag. --1ST7 (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- There was no consensus reached at either discussion, so, no, I won't be removing the CSD. If it is denied, I will nominate it for AfD so the discussion that never happened can happen. The only comment on either discussion was someone saying there is no precedent for it. If you know of one, please speak up. That is a very long way from a consensus. There are numerous long term love affairs in the history of TV. The fact that there are no articles on any of them tells me that you are wrong in creating this article. There is no misunderstanding whatsoever. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, there are a number of similar articles. Lucky Spencer and Elizabeth Webber and JR Chandler and Babe Carey are two examples. The instruction manual for splitting says that editors can be bold when making a split and do not need to open a discussion, but I did to be sure there weren't any objections before going forward with the split. --1ST7 (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... It's very true and should not be deleted. --216.155.211.46 (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Ziva's death
[edit]There's nothing "presumed" about Ziva's death. It's explicitly stated (9:30 into episode: Tony:"Cause we don't assume, we verify....Do we know she's dead?" Gibbs:"Yeah, she's dead, and we will get Kort." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zooks527 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Again, reverting the edit on "assumed" death and on no body found, those took place in teh 2nd-to-last episode. The season finale explicitly confirmed that she was dead. See the episode (transcript here:http://transcripts.foreverdreaming.org/viewtopic.php?f=193&t=27252) at approximately 9:30 -
- DiNozzo: What do we know? What are the facts? 'Cause we don't assume, we verify. Do we know she's dead? 'Cause if we know she's dead, we're gonna get him.
- Gibbs:Yeah, she's dead, and we will get Kort.
Get over it. She's dead. Zooks527 (talk) 16:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
"[H]er remains are not found at the house" as a final resolution is unsourced. That's from the 2nd to last episode, which functioned as a hook to the last episode. The last episode left no doubt she was dead, and did not address any "missing" remains. Zooks527 (talk) 00:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tony DiNozzo and Ziva David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926085945/http://www.tvfanatic.com/2009/10/ncis-cote-de-pablo-michael-weatherly-dish-on-ziva-and-tony/ to http://www.tvfanatic.com/2009/10/ncis-cote-de-pablo-michael-weatherly-dish-on-ziva-and-tony/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://voices.yahoo.com/ncis-season-7-episode-2-reunion-recap-review-4556217.html?cat=2 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130411024816/http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/04/09/ncis-see-tiva-get-up-close-and-personal-exclusive-photo/ to http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/04/09/ncis-see-tiva-get-up-close-and-personal-exclusive-photo/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)