Talk:Tonkin Highway/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Right, I will be reviewing this one and making straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning) - I will jot queries below. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
...volume and congestion on Albany Highway, and - something got chopped off here...- Done, removed trailing ", and" - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
A grade separated interchange..& This traffic light controlled at-grade intersection - hyphen here (x2).- I have changed "grade separated" → "grade-separated" (x2), but could you clarify where an extra hyphen would go in "This traffic light controlled at-grade intersection"? ... The phrase "traffic light controlled" (no hyphens) is used in over 3600 Australian government webpages (*.gov.au) [1] - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- I would have thought "traffic light-controlled" but happy to defer to sources. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- I have changed "grade separated" → "grade-separated" (x2), but could you clarify where an extra hyphen would go in "This traffic light controlled at-grade intersection"? ... The phrase "traffic light controlled" (no hyphens) is used in over 3600 Australian government webpages (*.gov.au) [1] - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Does the highway experience congestion at times of day?
- Yes... but I'll have to look for some sources, otherwise its just OR. - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Okay - will keep my fingers crossed - if nothing turns up after a day or two, then I will accept that the information is not accessible from a Reliable Source. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Found a couple of sources that should do (noting URLs here, will write something in the article tomorrow)
- - Evad37 (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, some good stuff there - I think the article will benefit. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've added a section on traffic volume, which will need to be copyedited and link-ified. I'll have a go at it sometime tomorrow, or feel free to jump in yourself. - Evad37 (talk) 15:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done - Evad37 (talk) 02:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've added a section on traffic volume, which will need to be copyedited and link-ified. I'll have a go at it sometime tomorrow, or feel free to jump in yourself. - Evad37 (talk) 15:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, some good stuff there - I think the article will benefit. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Okay - will keep my fingers crossed - if nothing turns up after a day or two, then I will accept that the information is not accessible from a Reliable Source. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes... but I'll have to look for some sources, otherwise its just OR. - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
have any major accidents occurred on it?- I've had a look, and I haven't found any I would consider major enough to warrant inclusion in the article - mostly single or no fatalities, mostly involving 1–2 vehicles (and most reports available online were in the past few years - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ok - thanks for checking. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've had a look, and I haven't found any I would consider major enough to warrant inclusion in the article - mostly single or no fatalities, mostly involving 1–2 vehicles (and most reports available online were in the past few years - Evad37 (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Otherwise looking pretty good - prose is good. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - great, a nice read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)