Jump to content

Talk:Tonga at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 14:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review
  • This is an interesting and well written article. I have just a few comments:
  • I've made some copy edits which you are free to change.[1]
  • "Tonga submitted its first delegation to the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, California. As of 2008, this delegation was its largest, although all were entered in the same sport and none of them were women. The first female Tongan athlete participated in the Olympics at the 1988 Summer Olympics in Seoul." - a little confusing. I had to read it over several times. I think you're saying that the first delegation (in 1984) was the largest so far (as of 2012) and did not have any women. The first female from Tonga entered in the 1988 Summer Olympics in Seoul, one of three athletes from Tonga.
  • "Tohi attended Tonga's Lavengamalie Christian College in the national capital of Nuku'alofa." - seems like unnecessary detail and should be removed - doesn't have anything to do with the Olympics.
  • suggest moving the image up to the "Athletics (Track & Field)" section where it won't bump into the table. Also, although there appears to be a game on the field, it also shows the track in the stadium, appropriate for Track and Field.
  • Will place on hold.

Good job! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And thank you, also, for doing this review and the Solomon Islands one. The article should be all set. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
    b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
    b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    c. no original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    no edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]