This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
@Frank042316: The edit you keep trying to restore, does not seem especially neutral or to be very reliable.[1] It's sourced solely to a Youtube video of the subject talking, and makes claims not shown anywhere in the video. It seems to be making an unsupported claim about what happened after it was uploaded. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 09:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Frank042316, You say you've added an appropriate source,[2] but there's still a problem of the section being original analysis. "quickly became seen as an infamous", "not only rejected but also went on to insult", "by extension" are some of the assertions that just aren't supported here. At minimum, everything after the citation is original research. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 13:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
