Talk:Tom Huck

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Gkessler3301 (talk · contribs)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Bboyx52 (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This subject matter is highly relevent in the field of contemporary printmaking. Tom Huck is part of collections at the Whitney Museum of American Art,Fogg Art Museum, the New York Public Library, Saint Louis Art museum as well as countless others. He has also gained notoriety after appearing in recently released contemporary printmaking textbooks and for creating the art for The Roots album Phrenology released in November of 2003 and certified gold in June of 2006. Although citations have not been worked out the information is valid and functions as a quick reference that will soon become a completed article. Having this posted will attract other users to help create and confirm this information.

References: Johnson, Ken, “Tom Huck: The Bloody Bucket Series”, New York Times, October 7 2005. Print.

Noyce, Richard. "Tom Huck." Critical Mass Printmaking Beyond the Edge. London: & C Black. 149-51. Print

Fick, Bill, and Beth Grabowski. Printmaking: A Complete Guide to Materials and Processes. New York: Lawrence King, 2011. Print.

Elizabeth Tucker and Kelly Hamilton, Alive Magazine 2010

David Bonetti, St. Louis Post Dispatch 2006

Bill North, Marianna Kistler Beach Museum of Art

Ian Froeb, Riverfront Times 2007

Bboyx52 (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Bboyx52 (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.evilprints.com/images/stories/huckartonpaper01.pdf

http://www.k-state.edu/english/symposium/2005/speakers/HUCK.pdf

http://www.baerridgway.com/Baer_Ridgway_Exhibitions/Tom_Huck_-_Biography.html

http://www.artnet.com/artists/tom-huck/

http://www.stlmag.com/St-Louis-Magazine/April-2011/First-Stop-Tom-Huck-at-SLUMA/#

http://www.artscope.net/VAREVIEWS/artex_huck0305.shtml

http://beach.k-state.edu/exhibitions/160/freaky-fables-from-the-foothills-prints-by-tom-huck

http://www.sluconnection.com/2011/02/18/sluma-presents-tom-huck-brutal-truth/

http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2007-01-17/news/evil-ink/

http://www.stltoday.com/entertainment/arts-and-theatre/reviews/article_4e1edab9-9fca-52fe-938d-f51e65544c43.html

http://www.nelson-atkins.org/art/exhibitions/PrintLovers/CollectionDatabase.cfm?id=33162&theme=Prints —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboyx52 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:"The Transformation of Brandy Baghead".jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:"The Transformation of Brandy Baghead".jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BagheadDetail.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:BagheadDetail.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (November 2023)

Large amounts of unsourced text in article added by several WP:SPAs that only edit this article. The unsourced content, excessive detail and promo should be removed. Netherzone (talk) 00:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to work on removing some unnessicary information and move some of it to make the page more streamlined Lessl (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Streamlined the 'work' section and combined in the 'commercial work'. Am working on some more diction and citations, but am pretty sure i have weeded out all the promo. Please feel free to point me at any that I may have missed. Lessl (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions. I'll have a look at the article in the next few days or weeks. There has been several COI editors, so it may take a while to go thru each source and check them against the claims in the article. Netherzone (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Required to remove warning

I am trying to fix this page and update it. To be clear I wrote a book about Huck and his work and I wanted the page to be accurate and problem free, This is my first time editing Wikipedia. I added citations and plan on adding information about his latest piece. I would like to add a paragraph about the book Tom Huck: Devil is in the Details but was not sure if that was allowed since I am the author. Can someone give me some direction so I don't break rules while fixing this. Gkessler3301 (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the COI Box and added more Citations. Gkessler3301 (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the COI tag. The article history shows textbook signs of paid editing, dating back to the 2000s. Paid editing has pretty much constructed this entire article. Please note that a conflict of interest exists in a scenario when:

you are, are related to or a friend of, or are a representative or employee of, Tom Huck;
you write about works that you wrote, co-wrote, own, or otherwise have a stake in.

Please be careful not to write about subjects where you have a conflict of interest.

Thank you. RetroCosmos ^{t • c} 07:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gkessler3301, you should not be citing your own book, please read WP:SELFCITE, and please read WP's behavioral guidelines on conflict of interest editing: WP:COI. Also no original research is permitted on WP, please read WP:NOR for more information on this WP policy. I will post more information on your user talk page. Netherzone (talk) 12:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]