Talk:Tom Dooley (song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as High-importance).

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lomax

The Alan Lomax documentary Appalachian Journey suggests that Lomax had at least some part in discovering/popularizing the song through his radio shows. Might be worth putting it in the article if anyone can find an independent source.

Pete Seeger explains in his book "How to Play the Five-String Banjo" that Frank Profitt made a recording which a guy named Frank Warner heard. Frank Warner learned to play the song, made his own record, which the Kingston Trio then heard, and got inspired to record it themselves. 69.129.39.228 (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Authorship, Copyright

Proffitt was "acknowledged by the courts as the preserver of the original version"? How is "preserver" a legal status? I've been preserving "Happy Birthday" on a regular basis for a very long time. I need a caselaw citation on this, not to mention something about how this gets around authorship for a copyright.Ramseyman (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The poet Thomas Land died in 1912. The fact that he has been dead for so long means that the original lyrics are now public domain. But I don't know if people have actually been singing the original lyrics all this time, or creating different versions of them. It's possible that parts of the best-known recordings have different words.

PS: You may be glad to know that Happy Birthday is officially public domain now. Also, you may be unhappy to recognize that whatever you or I know about copyright law, copyright predators know it far better. If you want to fight them, you'll need a great deal of time and money, and several very dedicated lawyers. TooManyFingers (talk) 01:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about the tune? Did Land write that too or did he put his lyric to a pre-existing tune--or was his original version even meant to be sung? Is this known? TheScotch (talk) 23:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Singles cats

Can we get some citations for this song being a "number one hit" in different countries? —Scouter Sig 22:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.254.95 (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a joke

How many times does it say Dooley is how Dula is pronounced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofa King Insane (talk • contribs) 09:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Four - which I've now now edited back to two, which I think covers the Dula/Dooley point. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tom Dooley (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.americancowboy.com/culture/top-100-western-songs
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110603111658/http://www2.birthplaceofcountrymusic.org/node/207 to http://www.birthplaceofcountrymusic.org/node/207
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101224205742/http://www2.grammy.com/Recording_Academy/Awards/Hall_Of_Fame/ to http://www2.grammy.com/Recording_Academy/Awards/Hall_Of_Fame/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on the vowel

There is no need to go into "characteristic of Appalachian speech." In British dialects as late as 1740, we see the vowel sound of "say," "hay" with words that contemporary American and British speech treats with the vowel sound of "see" and "heat." Alexander Pope several places rhymes "tea" with "say."

American settlers preserved the speech they came over with. The more geographically isolated they were, the longer they maintained their "original" vowels. Consequently, hillspar dialects will still pronounce the first name "Bill" as "Beel" and harden the initial consonant in a word like "city" (and push the vowel) to "seedty."

So long as Tom Dula's last name had an accented final syllable, the vowel would be fronted and raised.

Honestly, y'all, it's just a dialect, and this particular vowel doesn't explain "Opry." Hithladaeus (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://genius.com/The-kingston-trio-tom-dooley-lyrics. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]