This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tomcarrstudio.com/tom_carr/curriculum.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see a large body of text at the url you give. There is a list of works and that's it. However, I agree this article remained unsourced and there were also some significant COI editing taking place. All the same, I can't see that as a justifiable reason to delete 5 years of edits. That seems to be a mis-use of rollback. Sionk (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm truly sorry if the way I dealt with the copyvio here has upset you. It is the only surefire way I know of doing it: revert to the last clean version before the addition, add back the essential referenced material subsequently added, and then request revision-deletion of the intervening edits (which has now been done here - I can't do that myself because I'm not an admin; actually I'm not a roll-backer either, but Twinkle gives me the "restore this version" option). If it isn't done that way, the copied material can still be accessed through the article history, and thus is still (illegally) stored on Wikipedia servers. I can understand your displeasure that your work got thrown out with the bath-water, but I think we agree that there were big sourcing and COI problems here also. Apart from the legal aspects, the main problem as I see it with massive insertions of material from elsewhere is that they stifle the natural development of the article by normal wp processes. This article has improved more in the last 12 hours or so than in the whole of those five years (thank you!). I very much doubt if it will now be deleted; if I see it expand much more I will probably in any case withdraw the nomination.
