Talk:Tokyo Union
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Note to admin considering the speedy, the same page was later created at Tokyo union. Basement12 (T.C) 23:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Propose merge
[edit]I propose that this stub be merged with the stub at Tatsuya Takahashi. Maybe two stubs will make a right.
Vmavanti (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The group meets WP:MUSIC as an ensemble, and Takahashi is also covered in sources as a musician in his own right. Expansion is always an option - though it may be easier with help from Japanese-speaking editors. Chubbles (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- "Expansion is always an option"...if other people do the work. If Santa Claus doesn't come, the "article" will remain a stub for another ten years, which benefits no one.
Vmavanti (talk) 01:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC) - How many Japanese-speaking editors do you know?
Vmavanti (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)- None of these are arguments in favor of a merger. Chubbles (talk) 01:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you never answer my questions? You said "it may be easier with help from Japanese-speaking editors". Do you have anyone specific in mind? That is a serious question. Do you know of any editors who can work on this article? Or were you simply engaging in wishful thinking again? That is not helpful in a debate about any subject. Let's stay on the ground.
Vmavanti (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)- This is a merger proposal discussion. Let's stay on the ground. Chubbles (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I am, as usual. I'm the one asking and answering legitimate questions and you are the one dodging them. Would you care to elaborate on this cryptic sentence: "Expansion is always an option - though it may be easier with help from Japanese-speaking editors"
Vmavanti (talk) 12:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)- I suggested this as an alternative action to merging. Your response seems to be that you think it unfeasible - I disagree, and even if it were, it would not by itself leave merging the only viable option. I'd like to hear what others think on the matter. Chubbles (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and I'm asking you a legitimate practical question. Don't draw conclusions. There's no need to read between the lines. I'm not asking rhetorical questions or figurative questions. These are not jokes. I mean literally what I say. Let's address this point first: Do you know any Japanese-speaking editors who can work on the article?
Vmavanti (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)- The best place to ask would be Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan. There seem to be quite a few members of that project who can read Japanese. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and I'm asking you a legitimate practical question. Don't draw conclusions. There's no need to read between the lines. I'm not asking rhetorical questions or figurative questions. These are not jokes. I mean literally what I say. Let's address this point first: Do you know any Japanese-speaking editors who can work on the article?
- I suggested this as an alternative action to merging. Your response seems to be that you think it unfeasible - I disagree, and even if it were, it would not by itself leave merging the only viable option. I'd like to hear what others think on the matter. Chubbles (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I am, as usual. I'm the one asking and answering legitimate questions and you are the one dodging them. Would you care to elaborate on this cryptic sentence: "Expansion is always an option - though it may be easier with help from Japanese-speaking editors"
- This is a merger proposal discussion. Let's stay on the ground. Chubbles (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you never answer my questions? You said "it may be easier with help from Japanese-speaking editors". Do you have anyone specific in mind? That is a serious question. Do you know of any editors who can work on this article? Or were you simply engaging in wishful thinking again? That is not helpful in a debate about any subject. Let's stay on the ground.
- None of these are arguments in favor of a merger. Chubbles (talk) 01:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- "Expansion is always an option"...if other people do the work. If Santa Claus doesn't come, the "article" will remain a stub for another ten years, which benefits no one.