Talk:Togodumnus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article needs to be re-worked in light of the info in Tiberius Claudius Cogidubnus. Both need to be merged. I'll undertake to do this when the dust settles in Caratacus.

They should not be merged. As I have explained on the Caratacus talk page, they're not the same person. --Nicknack009 02:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I have explained in the discussion page for Tiberius_Claudius_Cogidubnus, and in your Wiki User page why they should

-- WikiRat 18:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I found someone who has written on this topic, someone that agrees it is likely Togodumnus and Cogidubnus are one and the same person. Professor Barry Cunliffe's book on Fishbourne Roman Palace argues that the two were one and the same. He is considered a credible expert by most. Here is a review of his book. I mentioned Barry earlier. Given that this idea isn't something I made up since there is at least one scholars who agrees, can you guys agree perhaps that a review of this article is necessary is necessary?. WikiRat 17:37, 3 November 2005 (EST)

Is that better? --Nicknack009 18:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Overstated arguments

I have rewritten and re-sourced the arguments about Dio's Togodumus possibly being Tacitus' C/Togidubnus. It is not possible, whatever Miles Russell says, to argue that Dio can be interpreted as reading something other than what he actually says. Dio clearly says that Plautius defeated Caratacus, then Togodumnus, and both of them fled (60.20), and that Togodumnus died shortly after that battle on the Thames, leading to a desire on the part of the British to avenge his death (60.21). To say this can actually be read as saying that Togodumnus did not die and in fact changed sides is absurd. It is only possible to argue, as David Mattingly and John Hind do, that what Dio wrote was mistaken. I have therefore, after discussion on The Classical Greece and Rome Wikiproject, reined in the wild overstatement and cited respectable scholarly sources in support of my rewrite. --Nicknack009 (talk) 21:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Togodumnus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051108045201/http://romans-in-britain.org.uk/clb_tribe_catuvellauni.htm to http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/clb_tribe_catuvellauni.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]