Jump to content

Talk:Todos Los Romances

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Todos Los Romances/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 14:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • albums in which Miguel covers → past tense
  • four of the five stars → four out of five srats
  • and peaked at number 12 on the Billboard Top Latin Albums → and peaked at number 12 on Billboard's Top Latin Albums chart

Infobox

[edit]
  • Flawless ;)

Background and release

[edit]
  • The "main articles" header is superfluous as the articles are already mentioned in the section's body.
  • The album, which was produced by Armando Manzanero and arranged by Bebu Silvetti, → Produced by ..., the record
  • certified gold → certified Gold
  • It received a Grammy nomination for Best Latin Pop Album and sold over seven million copies. → You already talked about its sales before
  • and Kiko Cibrian co-produced with Miguel, and it won a → and Kiko Cibrian co-produced the record with Miguel, with it winning a
  • Todos Los Romances which the contains → comma before "which" + remove "the"

Reception

[edit]
  • on the Spanish Albums Chart and sold → on the Spanish Albums Chart, selling
  • 200,000 copies in the country.[13] The album was also certified double Platinum by the Productores de Música de España for shipping 200,000 → 200,000 copies in the country and gaining a double Platinum certification awarded by Pro...
  • on the Billboard Top Latin Albums → as in the lead
  • number 6 → number six (not above ten)

Charts

[edit]
  • Flawless ;)

Certifications

[edit]
  • Flawless ;)

Other stuff

[edit]

Copy-violation

[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]
  • As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article (I can't verify the books, so I trust you with this!)
  • No dead links! Good job!

Outcome

[edit]
I'll get to work on it this Saturday hopefully. Erick (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cartoon network freak: Yo! Just addressed everything that was brought in the review. Thanks for taking your time to review this article! =D Erick (talk) 22:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gladly passing! Congrats, Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.