Talk:Todd Weiler

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Well?

http://www.sltrib.com/news/3915832-155/utah-lawmaker-wants-porn-filtered-from 2602:30A:C7D4:9380:129A:DDFF:FE4A:7BE (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added this to the article. ♟♙ (talk) 17:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested edit 2/3/21

In regards to the following content from the article:

Todd maintains a fundamental misunderstanding of socialism which he broadcasts through posts on Twitter.

I believe this content is applicable given the subject of the article is a politician and this sentence describes a viewpoint held by them that is verified through the multiple included sources of their tweets. As for the issue of objectivity raised by @65.130.56.77, sourced information should not be removed from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased. While it may be possible to word the sentence more precisely, I do believe it is impartial as it stands, per WP:NPOV. I am not sure why @65.130.56.77 said this sentence is an attempt at immortalization of a personal disagreement with the subject of the article, as the sentence and sources are not about any particular argument; it is about the subject of the article's broader philosophy of government. I encourage further discussion to reach a consensus. —FORMALDUDE^(talk) 02:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is being continually reverted. Please reach a consensus before changing the material again. 68.66.164.26 (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: wouldn't the sentence constitute WP:SYNTHESIS as written, as it's sourced to his own Twitter posts? He didn't say in his own Tweets that he has a misunderstanding of Socialism, and though the statement may very well be true, I think we need a reliable third-party source specifically supporting that statement (especially on a WP:BLP). ♟♙ (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It probably does constitute WP:SYNTHESIS as written. I can appreciate gathering more third-party sources. What do you think of this rephrasing along with the two additional sources?

Weiler maintains a dismissive view of socialism, communism, and other economic systems that he perceives as threatening to American capitalism.

https://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=55948327&itype=CMSID

https://www.deseret.com/2019/3/8/20667829/utah-senate-oks-push-to-teach-about-failed-economic-systems-of-socialism-communism

—FORMALDUDE ^(talk) 21:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in getting back. That looks better to me! ♟♙ (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]