Talk:Todd McEwen
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Todd McEwen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Copyvio
[edit]Hello Didn't realise the Granta thing was a copyright issue - I thought using material from previously published sources gave Wikipedia's entries further authenticity. My mistake. All apart from one sentence was my own work though so if you could restore the article...? Mousehead 02:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the copyright issue is a bit more extensive than that. I believe an admin is supposed to remove the template, not the editor who placed it.
- Citing reliable sources gives credibility and is required for all articles, but copying text is not ok. Note that simply modifying copyrighted text is not sufficient to avoid copyright infringement.
- To go forward, you can work on a revised article at Talk:Todd_McEwen/Temp, but leave a note on this page saying you are doing so. Let me know if i can help. Toddstreat1 23:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've rewritten. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 16:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
[edit]I'm moving the reviews of WSWK here for now. They're not really references and are borderline promotional. I don't want to delete them though.