Talk:Tocowa, Mississippi

A fact from Tocowa, Mississippi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the 1700s and 1800s, Tocowa, Mississippi, was home to a natural spring that Native Americans visited for its reputed healing powers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April.

Wikipedia

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Ghost towns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinates

Resolved

– Correct coordinates are now in place.

- ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 05:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The coordinates for Tocowa are Latitude: 34.22361 : Longitude: -90.05972. I just don't know how to convert this for use in the infobox. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 04:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns

Material added to this article in this edit replicates text from this source, which archives confirm predates our usage by several years. Given that it references sources as recent as 1985, it is obviously not PD by age. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]