Talk:Toba Tek Singh

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani cities.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move

I think the current Tobey Te Hings article needs to be moved to Tobey Te Hings District (as it is about the district) and then this article should be moved to Tobey Te Hings.

Thank you
Kalahari Sahib 22:58, 10 December 2007 (GMT)

Suggest we discuss the two moves together at Talk:Tobey Te Hings#Requested move. Andrews (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2007 (CUT)

Name in Gurmukhi script

Recently, someone from IP 108.115.142.224 objected on it's name written in Gurmukhi script. First of all, it's named after a Sikh saint named, Tek Singh. So Gurmukhi is very closely related to the article but as you described I've removed the Gurmukhi name from "native name" filed of the infobox. Secondly, Wikipedia is not for just Pakistan. The native lang. name helps the users understanding the name who don't know Urdu. TariButtar (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not TTS is named after a Sikh saint makes absolutely no difference to the fact that this city is Pakistan, and not East Punjab. Gurmukhi is not a script used in Pakistan. If this city were in East Punjab, writing its name would make sense in Gurmukhi - but this is Pakistani Punjab. Likewise, Granada in Spain is derived from an Arabic name, yet its name is not written in Arabic on the Granada page. A

Regarding the fact that this page isn't just written for Pakistanis (which if we believed that, then this page would be written entirely in Urdu), then you still cannot simply include various languages so prominently. The "native language" name you speak of is an invalid point, because the name wasn't altered into some Urdu variant: it is pronounced and spelled exactly as it would be in Punjabi, and the Shahmukhi script.

If you wish to make this page more accessible for East Punjabis, then you should go ahead and make a Gurmukhi version of this page. Because I find it hard to believe that anyone who is interested in reading this page would not know that the "Singh" identifies it as a city named after a Sikh. And if they don't recognize that Singh is a Sikh name, then I really doubt the presence of Gurmukhi script will elucidate that point (Since if they dont know what Singh is, they very unlikely know anything about Gurmukhi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.0.122 (talk) 20:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the previous commenter. This is Pakistan, not East Punjab. The "clarification" argument isn't very good, because the Indian city of Ahmedabad is a Persian/Urdu name, but Indians don't write the Urdu/Persian script on the Ahmedabad page. Likewise, Toba Tek Singh is a Sikh name, but we don't need to include Gurmukhi script since Indian's wont include our scripts for their major cities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.186.68.229 (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I add my support to using only Urdu/Shahmukhi Punjabi on this page. I am heartened by the fact that East Punjabis still feel a sense of attachment to this town, but it is a Pakistani town - not an Indian one. It is preposterous to suggest we use your scripts in our country. We both use Nastaliq - but only you use Gurmukhi.Willard84 (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Toba Tek Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324234632/http://www.tobateksingh.gov.pk/ to http://www.tobateksingh.gov.pk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]