Talk:Tliltocatl albopilosus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article uses text donated by Wildscreen from their ARKive project (see below). For further information, please see Wikipedia:GLAM/ARKive. |
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Wildscreen ARKive texts. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011090810014488. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Images
[edit]I made a gallery and uploaded a picture of a juvenile as well. Didn't remove anything from the article.Privateiron (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Pets
[edit]Oh goodie, another irrelevent pet section that is more of a care sheet than anything else. Wiki doesn't need these sections. Again, I will delete in the next few days if no one can come up with a good reason to keep it. At most there should be something saying they are popularly kept as pets or something of that ilk. A care sheet it should not be. Man Over-bored (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Copy/paste
[edit]A somewhat over-zealous editor made me take a second look at this page for references, and its pretty clear that the conservation section is just a copy paste of this website: http://www.arkive.org/curlyhair-tarantula/brachypelma-albopilosum/
I know with wikipedia its a chicken/egg situation but the website does claim to have been authenticated in 2008, whereas the conservation section doesn't appear to have been here before 2011. It also directly cites CITES (kek), which is pretty useless in of itself. Needs updated. Man Over-bored (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brachypelma albopilosum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514130441/http://www.eightlegs.org/curly/curly.html to http://www.eightlegs.org/curly/curly.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Improper move
[edit]Singularities421 moved this page from Brachypelma to Tlitocatl based on a single primary source. This is contrary to WP:PSTS. We report what primary sources say, but we wait until a reliable secondary source, in this case the World Spider Catalog, accepts a genus change. Otherwise there is no guarantee that other zoologists will accept the move. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)