Talk:Tkrzw

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Mistake

Is there a mistake with respect to the numbers? If I want to have 50% filling at most, then 1 million records should be stored in a table with 2 million entries. 6 bytes per record would give a 12MByte table.

Dubious comparison to SQLite

and was a multithreaded embedded database manager, comparable in functionality to SQLite[1] (but without an actual SQL implementation)

Very little about this makes sense. SQLite is indeed an embedded database manager, but one that is aggressively single threadded. Saying that something is like SQLite, but multithreaded and lacking an actual SQL implementation is about as sensical as saying something is like an elephant, but bright pink, and tiny. Can anyone get ahold of the cited source to see if there's anything to this claim? PiAndWhippedCream (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty much straight from the source, IIRC. In any case, both are libraries that manage databases stored as simple files, implement hash tables and B+ trees and have a C API for manipulating databases. (I would personally say Berkeley DB is more similar, but I've gone with what the sources say.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]