Talk:Title loan

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is prone to spam. Please monitor the References and External links sections.

Bias in article

This article is very biased with no references. Recently, I deleted a section that was extremely biased and uninformative. This article needs to be expanded, cited and objective. LtGen 06:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was not very good. I've rewritten and expanded the article significantly; let me know if you see any problems. 24.91.134.90 08:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you 100% that this article is very bias. It does not explain that other states besides the 20 listed happen to give loans based on titles, but are not "Title Pawn", but a consumer finance loan given at a maximum interest rate of 30-36% APR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.177.56 (talk) 19:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrities Who Do Commercials For Title Loan Companies

Should there be a section that lists celebrities who do title loan commercials?

There are many celebrities who do title loan commercials (and many celebrities who wish they had not done these commercials in the past).

Should there be a section that contains a list of them?

72.82.177.202 (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is that would be tantamount to a blacklist. The names of celebrities don't help define the product or industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchdog3141 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Title loan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

States?

The section on states where such loans are offered seems contradictory. (Firstly, the title of the section makes it seem as thought the loans were offered by the state.)

It has a paragraph on the regulations in New Hampshire, but then does not include New Hampshire in the list of states where the loans are legal!

Has the regulation in NH changed recently? Or is one of the paragraphs in error? ApLundell (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]