Talk:Tipton-Rosemark Academy
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Vandalism
[edit]I think we should upgrade to semi protection. Averytiredturkey (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please read WP:PROTECTION. The low incidence of vandalism in the last six months does not justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh really I just undid a vandalism comment. Averytiredturkey (talk) 23:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, can you please roll back the change you did. Averytiredturkey (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, per WP:NOTNEWS. Furthermore, the text you removed was not vandalism; "white flight academy" was sourced to this dissertation published by the University of Mississippi graduate school. Per WP:DISSERTATION, they are not ideal sources, but may be appropriate in some contexts, which I'd say is debatable here. Pinging User:Jacona, who added the content originally for visibility. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe the text he added was not neutral which would break wikipedias rules I also believe I was wrong about the text you removed. Thank you for your help hope to hear back soon -Averytiredturkey Averytiredturkey (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, per WP:NOTNEWS. Furthermore, the text you removed was not vandalism; "white flight academy" was sourced to this dissertation published by the University of Mississippi graduate school. Per WP:DISSERTATION, they are not ideal sources, but may be appropriate in some contexts, which I'd say is debatable here. Pinging User:Jacona, who added the content originally for visibility. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)