Talk:Tiny Banker Trojan

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Defense Against Tinba

Is misleading and needs some improvement. Also it should be deleted due to no references in the paragraph. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

At the end of the introduction paragraph, add the following sentence: "Tech Support Scammers have also been known to refer to this trojan or other viruses by name in a confidence trick after typing the netstat, dir /s or tree command in the command prompt to trick their victims into thinking there are hackers on their computer stealing their banking information. This is not an occurrence of the actual trojan, but simply an attempt to fool non-tech savvy victims into being fearful of getting their information stolen to get them to comply with the rest of the scam." DarkoOfTheDark (talk) 19:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]