Talk:Timothy S. Healy/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 09:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Early Life

• After the company's collapse during the Great Depression of 1929, he took on various jobs This is a poor closure of this section and does not identify who is being spoken about. Closure of this section should be about Timothy Healy, not his father.
  • Rephrased the sentence. Ergo Sum 02:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Georgetown University

• The other two candidates for the position considered by the search committee were the president of Fairfield University, Thomas R. Fitzgerald, and the former Jesuit provincial superior for New York, Robert A. Mitchell this might be considered irrelevant?
  • It probably is. I've removed it. Ergo Sum 02:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Final

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Well written article of a rather ambitious Jesuit leader. Kindly attend to matters listed above;.

#::  GA on hold       --Whiteguru (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your review, Whiteguru. Ergo Sum 02:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: I thank you kindly for your edits. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Passed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.