Talk:Timothy Everest/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wikipedian2 (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	It appears to me to have pro-Everest themes running through it. The article needs to be more balanced. See WP:NPOV.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	The article has been recently recommended for deletion by an editor.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Unfortunately this cannot become a good article, the article seems very bias, and as it has been recently recommended for deletion under WP:PEACOCK, I cannot say the article is very stable. Please resubmit after addressing the issues concerned. Thank-you. Wikipedian2 (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]