Talk:Timing diagram (Unified Modeling Language)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a computing diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
--- UML Timing Diagrams are very new.
I was expecting an article on digital electronic Timing Diagrams here, I am happy to write one.
Should it go here or somewhere else????
Mark
- I would move this to UML Timing Diagram and create Digital electronic timing diagram and have this be a disambiguation page. —Ben FrantzDale 18:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm. This page here is rather empty. However, what about Timing diagram (UML) for the new location of this page? --Ligulem 21:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, this should be a disambiguation page. The current page contents should go to UML Timing Diagram and electronic timing diagrams should go to Digital Timing Diagram. I think the term 'UML Timing Diagram' is a commonly enough used term, and 'Digital Timing Diagram' is a more precise term than 'Electronic Timing Diagram'. --Dirkbike 19:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
--- Where is the "collaboration diagram?" Geoffrey