Talk:Timeshare/Archives/2016

Warning to User:Pocketthis

You have maliciously edited my revisions on this page, and claim that I am the one in error. Please note that if you continue to vandalize my edits, you WILL be reported to Wikipedia administration. Quidam65 (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC

• Excuse me sir, but I wrote over 90% of this article. You have been destroying it with poor wording, and nonfactual statements. Any edit that you make that I don't think is constructive, will be reworded to make sense. If you're going to report me to someone, please do it quickly so we don't drag this on. P.S.: I'm making edits, you are in an edit war making reversals. Why are "your" edits important, and mine vandalism? You've been here long enough, and been in trouble enough times to know exactly what I'm talking about. I haven't liked one edit you've made here yet. This isn't a La-Dee-Da-article similar to others I've edited like science or movie articles. This is a really important article because over 20,000 timeshare prospects come here every month counting on the facts to help advise them on whether or not they should be spending tens of thousands of their hard earned dollars on a timeshare. This article must tell in earnest, the facts both pro and con. This is not an article to edit for the sake of editing, as you have been doing. This article needs to stand solid as a beacon of truth for the public that visit here for help. Your edits are not only "useless", but they are conjecture on your part. I spent 40 years in this business, and am now an advocate for the prospective buyers. I am not about to let a timeshare owner in his 40s that is still wet behind the ears when it comes to this industry, and all its intricacies, practice his editing skills in this article, and undo all the work we have done to get the article to this level. If you were making valid grammar corrections, I would have no issue with your edits. However, you have attempted to rewrite the entire article over the past month or so, for no reason other then to put it into "your own words". Not this article Mr. Quidam65. A mistake here, and someone could be out of pocket a lot of money they will then complain to Wikipedia about, when they discover one of your facts wasn't quite as you reworded it. Please leave it be and move on. Pocketthis (talk) 23:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC)