The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I don’t disagree with these two edits here and here, but I reverted them because no reason was given, and I wanted to make sure that no one had any reasonable objection to their removal. What do people think? RGloucester (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Demonstrating the facts of the President's activities for the entire day of 9-11-12 seems to be a worthy goal. Several sources had to be removed because they did not match the actual timeline. For example, whereas some sources speculated based on unnamed contacts that the President was in the control room watching the attack begin to unfold, he was in fact at Bethesda when the attack commenced. Likewise, if the President's further actions could be construed by the reader as frivolous, they are nonetheless important to present. Rather than favor any observation based on chronologyy alone, the entire day should be represented so the reader can draw their own conclusions. ClaudeReigns (talk) 04:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Should there be mentions of the removal of command of GEN Ham and RDML Gaouette? There are references that connect the two to the subject of this article, and references that deny that the removal of the two general/flag officers are connected to the attacks.