Talk:Timeline of telescope technology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Timeline of telescope technology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

With no additional comments expressed in nearly six months, I'm closing the merge proposal as no consensus. -- MarcoTolo 01:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. It looks like Timeline of telescope technology duplicates Timeline of telescopes, observatories, and observing technology. The former does seem to have some very useful expanded information. I propose merging Timeline of telescope technology into Timeline of telescopes, observatories, and observing technology. Fountains of Bryn Mawr 17:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - in my view the two articles are not duplicates, especially as the Timeline of t, o ,and o t has very little on telescopes, but a great deal on observatories. I would propose renaming it to Timeline of observatories. It should also be noted that telescopes are not simply astronomical telescopes, but also includes terrestrial telescopes. There should perhaps be a third timeline of astronomical technology to include levels, sextants, octants, transits, astrolabes, the Alphonsine tables etc. There are many ways to slice and dice the information, and I feel a lot would be lost by trying to put it all into a single article - following that course means we would eventually end up with one gargantuan article as a "timeline of technology" - to my mind, teasing out and looking at individual threads in individual articles is instructive. WLD 22:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Definatley SHOULD be merged both very relevent to each other Bryn has got it right!!!--124.168.200.224 06:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)--124.168.200.224 06:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)JJ[reply]

I don't see how the fact that two articles are relevant to each other supports the argument that they be merged. The article on yeast is relevant to the articles on both wine and bread: that does not mean it should be merged with them. WLD^talk|edits 09:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

optics

neither the pin hole camera nor magnifying or concave lenses are mentioned in the Book of Optics it only contains his theory of vision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J8079s (talk • contribs) 20:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of telescope technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070627234624/http://www.grosseteste.com/cgi-bin/textdisplay.cgi?text=de-iride.xml to http://www.grosseteste.com/cgi-bin/textdisplay.cgi?text=de-iride.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]