Talk:Timeline of reactions to the 2020 Hong Kong national security law (January 2021)

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (296)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,513) • Stub-Class articles (6,679)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

First copy-editing round completed

I have removed the two tags (style, grammar, etc and suspected machine translation) attached to the top of this article, as the issues they highlighted seem to have been reduced sufficiently, though not fully removed. The article length made it a sizeable task; I may have trimmed too much in some places, in which case I ask for understanding. I found that there were some mistakes – such as quotes that I could not find in any references, and factual errors – that seem hardly explicable through a poor machine translation alone. Also, the material on CCP officials appeared to suffer much less from language issues than other parts of the article. It is particularly here that some material had to be cut for insufficient relevance. While I do not want this to be understood as a premature assessment, I think it is possible that the articles for the later months (which I haven't read yet) suffer from similar problems as this one, in which case I hope the work done on this article may aid other editors.--CRau080 (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]