Talk:Timeform

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Horse racing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Timeform is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ratings

The ratings on this page are not strictly Timeform ratings: they are actually a mixture of Timeform ratings and ratings taken from the book A Century of Champions by John Randall and Tony Morris (1999). Many of the Randall/Morris ratings differ significantly from the equivalent Timeform ratings. Timeform did not publish ratings for American-trained horses before the 1990s and so the ratings shown for champions such as Secretariat and Native Dancer are purely historical ratings, calculated many years after these horses' racing careers were over. It would be good to have an accurate list of the original and genuine Timeform ratings, which have earned a considerable reputation throughout the racing world. Bartflower 16:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Betfair purchase?

The Betfair purchase has not been mentioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.163.242.18 (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Frankel rating

Surely the rating given to Frankel is a provisional one, and it is therefore not appropriate to include it in the table at this stage. Unless someone can give me a reason not to, I'm going to remove it. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P

Why is there a P beside Spinter Sacre's rating? If the P stands for provisional then surely there should also be a P beside Long Run as he's still racing. Perfectamundo (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Small p means horse is likely to improve. https://www.timeform.com/horse-racing/features/guides/abbreviations (Mobile mundo (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

TimeformUS vs Timeform

I noticed that there are significant discrepancies between TimeformUS and Timeform ratings. For example, Gun Runner's Stephen Foster win this year was rated 139 by TimeformUS, but he was only given a 133 in the Timeform global rankings. On the flip side, Mor Spirit's Met Mile win was rated 130 by TimeformUS and given a 132 in the Timeform global rankings. Clearly, the two systems differ in some way, so I think it's safe to assume that they are not necessarily directly comparable.

What should we do about horses given their ratings by TimeformUS in the highest rated racehorses section? Keeping them in without some sort of way to differentiate between TimeformUS rankings and Timeform rankings skews the overall picture of who the best rated racehorses are. I propose we create two separate tables, one for horses by Timeform rating and one for horses by TimeformUS rating. This change might be considered controversial by some people, so I thought I might run it by other editors first. Aspening (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927032854/http://www.drf.com/row/pps/ap_million.pdf to http://www.drf.com/row/pps/ap_million.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]