Talk:Time Out (company)

Magazines High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Time Out vs Radio Times

Time Out was instrumental in getting the Radio Times and TV Times duopoly on TV guide listings broken. The only online reference I can find for this is this article so does anyone have any better references so we can refer to it here, as well as in the RT and TT pages? Shermozle 00:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved and redirect Time Out to time out. Ucucha 02:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time Out → Time Out (magazine) — I think the album by The Dave Brubeck Quartet, Time Out (album) ("one of the best-known and biggest-selling jazz albums"), is more well known than this magazine. Once this page is moved to Time Out (magazine), either one of the following would be fine:

Time Out (album) is moved to Time Out, or
Time Out is made into a redirect to the disambiguation page Time out.

I'll leave it up to others to figure out which is best. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 16:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support/Oppose I support moving the magazine, I oppose moving the album, I think a dab page should be targetted, the Time out dab page. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 22:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't believe The Dave Brubeck Quartet is the topic lead so I think redirecting Time Out to the Time out disambiguation page is the best option.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The album article and this page get a comparable amount of hits,^[1][2] even though this is at the undisambiguated title and the other one is dumped to the bottom of the disambiguation page. I'd say moving this to Time Out (magazine) and redirecting Time Out to the disambiguation page is the best option. Jafeluv (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support moving the magazine and Option 2 (Time Out redirecting to Time out per WP:PRECISION). — AjaxSmack 02:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with option 2. The magazine is not the primary topic, but nor is the album. Kanguole 11:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I have further moved this page to Time Out (company) because it appears to be about the company as a whole, not only about the magazine with the same name it publishes. Ucucha 02:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the title is still italicised, and the name of a company would not be. Move that this be moved to "Time Out (company)" without italics. 67.162.236.230 (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple editors

I added a magazine infobox to this article, but perhaps this is inappropriate so I did not complete it. The issue I am considering is that Time Out is a company that produces several Time Out magazines, and each magazine has its own staff in different cities. I am not sure if any staff is notable. What to do? Blue Rasberry 21:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]