Talk:Tim Naish

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

We need a portrait picture about him--Tamás Kádár 08:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update of this page

Hi folks, I am starting a full update of this page. I have set up a reflist for the citations so a name can be in the source text - less cluttered. I will focus originally on his education, moving into his career. Need to find citations that have accurate dates etc. The page will 'emerge' after editing sessions but will always be legible and organised for the reader. Feedback welcome.

Greg Realitylink (talk) 08:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article but the sources cited should be generally reliable and not fully deprecated (WP:DEPS). I'm sure we can find a good perennial source WP:RSP to replace any fully deprecated source used in the article. Amigao (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you bringing this to my talk section. I am still somewhat confused as to why Global Times references are not accepted? Is it because it's perceived as some sort of propaganda medium? Just looking at it now, there seem to be reputable articles. Not sure who is the final arbiter on these decisions and not making a fuss, just interested to get some insight into why is was taken down. Realitylink (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, have got this pretty much sequenced now. Realitylink (talk) 07:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]