Talk:Tim Moore (North Carolina politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Correct Characterization of the S.O.B.

The opening sentence should read "Tim Moore is a felon and worshiper of Satan...." PurpleMoonLander (talk) 00:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV & Sources

This article still reads like a resume. I added the NPOV template - is that too much? I am looking for reliable sources per Wikipedia:BLP. Found this. Does anyone have further suggestions for good sources? I would be willing to work on the article if we can find more. Thanks. MisterRandomized (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be in favor of removing everything that isn't reliably and neutrally sourced and building up from there. Rklawton (talk) 00:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, while the entry as a whole in Wikipedia should be WP:NPOV, individual WP:RSs do not have to be neutral. It's often better to have conflicting opinions, and give the reader both opposing views.

According to WP:BIASED, "Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject." --Nbauman (talk) 01:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Charlotte Observer article provides some good facts. Good source. I agree on inappropriate tone in this article - have moved private practice to end and deleted list of areas of law - common to small-town firm. This article is not supposed to be an advertisement for his firm. Will be working to fill in some facts on his early life and entry into student gov't and politics. Parkwells (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added content and cites from 3-4 independent sources and will seek more.Parkwells (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]