This article was nominated for deletion on October 1 2006. The result of the discussion was Delete. No notability established..
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I've just now undeleted the article's old history. The article was deleted by AFD for non notability. The new page is based on totally new claims of notability, and thus is far from a recreation. I would say that if someone feels that this new page fails notability, a new AFD is required. I have restored the history from the older version. This will allow for anyone to incorporate elements from the old page into the new. IMHO, if the new page meets notability requirements, it'll still meet them if elements of the older, non-notable page are added. I do not take a strong position myself as to whether the new page does or does not meet notability requirements. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is surely demonstrated by the books published by a serious publisher (Bloomsbury), and reviewed by serious publications such as The Times. ---Asteuartw (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]