Talk:Tim Kash

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Does anyone else get the feeling that this page was probably written by Tim Kash himself?? [This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 80.41.47.175 (talk) at 22:51, 3 September 2005. It may differ significantly from the current revision.]

Removal of reliable, NPOV references

Why are the references from BBC News, IMDb and the Independent constantly being removed? The justification for including them is that they relate and are integral to Kash's background and his tenure at TOTP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.164.251 (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask again - why insist on deleting reliable, NPOV references from the page? Could it be because the references detail Kash's lower points in his career, something the changed article doesn't do (instead, preferring to use colourful language that portray him in an unverifiable good light - ironic, given the claims against the BBC News, Independent and IMDb's supposedly unverifiable content)? It's also telling that the changes are made by accounts whose activity has only been to remove all negative, but important references to Kash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.82.154 (talk) 11:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection

I've fully protected this article for 3 days. I have intentionally protected the current version, as it's always better to protect a BLP without potentially contentious material than with. Please take this issue to WP:BLPN. Keep in mind that unsourced negative/contentious statements about living people must be removed immediately, and re-adding them is a big no-no. User's may also want to consider WP:RS, as I'm not sure that all of those so-called "references" actually meet our guidelines. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Negative TOTP info

Does anyone have any live links, or copies of old articles, that verify that Kash specifically (not just the show) was criticised? The only RS in the section is a dead link; this doesn't necessarily preclude it from being used, but since a lot of the rest of the section was badly sourced or didn't quite match the sources, I'm concerned. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In order to be fully WP:BLP compliant, I've replaced those sources with some that are still live and more clear. They don't talk about Kash as directly the problem, so the section has been revised accordingly. However, if reliable reviews can be found that ascribe part of the problem to Kash, then that info could be re-added. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tim Kash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbiz/article-22945160-top-of-the-pops-chopped.do
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702023359/http://www.timkashblog.com/ to http://www.timkashblog.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]