Talk:Tim Dawson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Removed line regarding Time as "worst writer to have series produced etc..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.175.82 (talk) 00:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It had just been changed from "youngest" to "worst" by a vandal, although I think as "youngest" is unsourced and possibly unverifiable, it shouldn't be in the article unless reliable sources can be found. —Snigbrook 02:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of details that made headline news.

I don't understand why someone deleted additions I made and which have appeared in national newspapers which I referenced. Happy to discuss if needed. Garnett F (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reinstated stuff that got anonymously deleted. I'm happy to discuss if anyone wants. Garnett F (talk) 07:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I delete things that are Twitter refs as these are not acceptable as fact. Are you a teacher? Just wondering because of the apparent Gill Keegan focus. 2A02:C7E:270C:D600:D528:958E:6E44:C92 (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm not sure if you made a mistake, perhaps? None of the stuff you deleted was Twitter referenced. Not a teacher, no. Not overly focused on anything. Just intrigued by what seems to be efforts to whitewash certain pages, and so I've set up a watch list so I'm notified each time the whitewashing happens, so I can fix it. Garnett F (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ah yes I can see where I've been overly zealous. Apologies. I've been insanely obsessional about Twitter referencing since students started citing Wiki in the same manner they would an academic paper from a respectable source. I guess I'm just as neurotic about that as you are about Tim Dawson and Gillian Keegan LOL :)! 2A02:C7E:270C:D600:D528:958E:6E44:C92 (talk) 13:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page was being whitewashed and a more senior editor kindly froze the page to tackle it. As soon as the freeze expired it seems the whitewasher was back. I've undone their edit, and remain happy to discuss if required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garnett F (talk • contribs) 15:07, 1 Feb 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

I have requested this article to be deleted for numerous reasons. I am happy to have a discussion with anyone to elaborate on Mr Dawson's Right to Erasure and the impact of this page. If you oppose to this deletion please message first before removing the tag to allow us the opportunity to explain further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joymartin23 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 16 Aug 2023 (UTC)

@Joymartin23: There is no requirement under Wikipedia policy to explain removal of a {{prod}} tag before it is removed; however, the editor who removed it did provide information in their edit summary on how to proceed (and on why such a request is likely to be denied). —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That said, a cursory review indicated one item in the article that ran against Wikipedia's guidelines for biographies of living persons. I have removed that unsourced item from the article. —C.Fred (talk) 13:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]